ON
THE evening of October 30, 1938, American radio listeners heard a series of
announcements describing attacks by beings from another world and eventually a
full-scale invasion that repelled every attempt to contain it. Thousands fled
their homes to escape. They had missed the introduction to a radio play, Orson
Welles’ celebrated dramatisation of H G Wells’ The War of the Worlds, and taken it for a
news broadcast. It suits modern journalists to debunk the ‘panic’ story as
a media myth, but there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that a significant
number of people were worried despite the fact that they hadn’t seen or heard
any Martians, nor did they have any other reason to believe they were under
attack than the radio. It is evident that people will react with alarm to a
sensational news story without clear evidence of its basis in reality. Now,
with the media more powerful than ever, we are living through a terror based on
the premise of a deadly plague that cannot be treated, constantly mutates,
spreads without symptoms and to which there is only one answer: total global
human atrophy.
I
am convinced beyond reasonable doubt that the ‘pandemic’ in any meaningful and
practical sense does not exist. It has been measured by a PCR test that its
inventor declared unfit for diagnostic purposes with a false positive rate that
renders it virtually useless. It is based on computer models that time and time
again have been proved to be wildly inaccurate. It is unclear where the UK
Government gets its figures from. The nucleotide chain of Covid-19 cannot be
positively identified. It has not been isolated according to the Koch
postulates. Koch
postulates - Google Search I
know no one, nor does anybody in my extended circle know anyone, who has been
admitted to hospital with Covid. In our daily reality, there is no evidence for
a pandemic. None whatsoever.
The
pandemic narrative does not require evidence. Like all
"science-based" fear narratives, this one tries to intimidate us all
into thinking the burden of evidence is on those of us convinced something is
wrong to prove it. It isn't. No more facts and figures.
The fallacy is exposing itself. Enough!
|
One
thing I am certain of is that we can no longer afford to go on listening to the
British Government. Look at their record: in March 2020, we were told to ‘stay
home, protect the NHS, save lives.’ It’s only going to be for three weeks, they
said, to ‘flatten the curve.’ Ten months later: ‘Now there’s a vaccine, we can
look at easing restrictions by Easter.’ A third lockdown is here, a fourth
looms and the Easter promise just isn’t going to happen. You can bet your
bottom dollar that by then this Government will be making more empty promises
about being out of this by 2022.
Broken word after broken word. Excuse after excuse. A
husband in a divorce case with a record this dire would be called
‘abusive’. There is only one word for it: lies.
With
dreary predictability, the UK Government has pursued the same path, more
lockdowns, more restrictions. Whatever we do, however much we go along with the
game, however many times we change our behaviour to follow the rules, the
result is the same: more lockdowns. There is now no escape from Devil’s Island
Britain.
The
logical fallacies of this entire narrative are so glaringly self-evident that
to explain them is a daunting task. For example: ‘Help Stop the Spread of
Coronavirus’. You might as well instruct the public to ‘Help Stop Death’.
Meaningless and impossible. ‘No return to normal without a vaccine.’ This is
preposterous. At no time in history has anyone ever postulated a vaccine as the
only way out of a health emergency, especially at the beginning of it. How
in the world has a ‘vaccine’ managed to emerge in six months? This has never been
achieved in history. ‘This can’t go on for ever.’ I see no reason
whatsoever to believe this. Governments can keep this up for as long as they
like. And it is all too clear that that is precisely what they intend to do.
Whether this is all a conspiracy or not is irrelevant: the only logical way for us to react to it is as
though it were. Otherwise we'll just keep hoping in vain to be released.
What is coming next? If you’ve read this far you know as well as I do. A
war on humanity that will simply go on and on with all the might and violence
of the state. Forced incarceration. More censorship. More rules.
Face-masks made compulsory outdoors. More ‘mutations’ and ‘waves’. More
‘pandemics’. Elections suspended. Forced or coercive ‘vaccination’.
Martial law. Almost total unemployment. Mass homelessness. The end of money.
The end of international travel. The disappearance of the High Street. The end
of pubs and restaurants. Business, education and entertainment permanently
relegated online. Finally, a population of robots who think they are free. And
if you think all of that is fantastic and paranoid, what would you have said a
year ago to the idea of endless lockdowns, media censorship, forced or
coercive mass testing, forced face mask wearing and forced isolation, all
of which has happened and is not going away?
As I tried to explain at the beginning of this essay, it is beyond
question that people will believe without evidence. If this were not so, belief
in God would not exist. The existence of religious belief is concrete testimony
of the capacity of humanity to believe something without evidence.
The way out, if there is one, is not clear. Mass resistance to clog up
the courts. General strikes. Mass removal of students from schools.
Petitions. Debates. Barter economies. But this is almost certainly a fantasy. I
cannot find hope in ‘the people’. Just maybe with lateral-flow-testing
replacing PCR, with commercial interests eventually becoming more urgent than
‘safety’, with elections making this all a political football, governments can
be persuaded to dig themselves out of this mess.
But we can’t rely on hope alone. The truth is, we’ve lost. You can’t
fight the state, and the idea that we can has been exposed for the empty myth
it is. Britain is now one of the world’s worst dictatorships and we are going
to have to learn how to survive and adapt to life in a totalitarian
state.
