So Lord Sumption has apparently
backed “vaccination passports,” at least according to Piers Morgan. Peter
Hitchens and Sir Desmond Swayne have now taken the “vaccine”, Sir Desmond
urging us to “make sure you get yours so we can all get back to
normal life,” and Mr. Hitchens saying he feels “defeated.”
When three such passionate, ardent
and compelling spokesmen against the illiberal policies being pursued by the UK
government so publicly capitulate to this extent, the message is loud and
clear. The “resistance” is over. Don’t fight it any more. For figures of this
stature to cave in so completely is the final nail in the coffin for any
meaningful opposition to these policies.
Effective resistance to the COVID-19
project in the UK is dead. In fact, it never really existed in the first place.
The truth is, the British people are psychologically and culturally incapable of
rebellion, “except when it comes to football” in the words of Simon Elmer
on Architects for Social Housing.
The reader may feel I’m peddling a
narrative of despair and point to the heroic efforts of Save Our
Rights, Simon Dolan, Piers Corbyn and James Delingpole, The White Rose ,investigative journalists
and editors on The Conservative Woman, Lockdown Sceptics, Off
Guardian and Spiked, not to mention the voices of Sir Desmond, Mr. Hitchens
and Lord Sumption. Yet many of these agencies are hampered in some way from being
really effective. Save Our Rights, though gallant and
indefatigable, lacks sufficient articulateness to be persuasive or effective in
recruiting others to its cause. Spiked, though it campaigns
against most of the UK government’s policies, has a pro-vaccination stance and
has tacitly endorsed “vaccine passports” for international travel, as evidenced
in Fraser Myers’ piece The Tyranny of Vaccine Passports.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2021/02/17/the-tyranny-of-vaccine-passports/
He asserts: “The issue has become
confused by two separate demands being dubbed ‘vaccine passports’. For some,
this refers to passports for international travel. The Tony Blair Institute for
Global Change, for instance, has ominously asserted that ‘proving Covid-19 health
status will become a fact of life’ in its call for vaccine passports. But its
proposals are focused on opening up borders. In many ways, this is less
contentious. It’s not unusual to need a whole host of jabs to travel to certain
places”.
Lockdown Sceptics is, I’m afraid,
strongly pro-vaccine and a casual trawl through its fora reveals a significant
preponderance of coercive vaccination and lockdown advocates. Simon Elmer
writes brilliantly and provides evidence to back up his arguments, but is
unfortunately very long-winded and too fond of quoting obscure “philosophers”
like Georgio Agamben, a figure virtually unknown outside the arena of COVID
scepticism. A number of op-eds seem to be written by people with Ph.Ds, and
this would seem to be a good thing. Yet such people have a tendency to
parade their intellectual superiority by writing in a vernacular of convoluted
sentences and words which have little meaning for the majority of readers. I’ve
come across several such pieces that could have made exactly the same point
without recourse to this level of verbosity.
Wherever I go in the “real world,” all I hear from
others is the official narrative. It’s clear that very few people actually
believe there is anything wrong with it and most cannot seem to see anything
absurd about the “virus” and this preposterous “vaccine.” It’s been suggested
that many are more frightened of the coming dystopia than the “virus” and
simply do not want to think about it.
If only we had been able to somehow combine the
erudition of those like Sumption and Hitchens with the passion of Sir Desmond
and the grass roots appeal of Save Our Rights, along with a flair for
organisation we may have been able to make a difference. In fact, we could have
made a difference last year by simply failing to comply with the Government’s
useless and unenforceable “mask” diktat. But as usual, the British public did
what it does best, it grinned and bore it.
I wish I didn’t feel like this, but it’s clear that
there is no effective opposition to the COVID project in this country. There
never was. For those of us who are left, there will soon arrive the “vaccine”
moment, when we are forced to decide whether to join the Borg collective,
because resistance is futile.
Personally I have accepted Vaccination as my career could be irrevocably harmed were I to refuse it.
ReplyDeleteAcademic Institutions seem to have stricter policies on mask wearing and Vaccination.
Personally I am more concerned about the harm to the Global Economy.
Who says that effective resistance cannot be realized.
ReplyDelete"A single spark starts a prairie fire." Mao Zedong.
All it took was a meeting of fifteen men in Shanghai's French Concession on July 1st 1921 to found the Chinese Communist Party. What mattered was that the party had an adaptable program.
The idea is to move with the times and persuade.
Less people willingly wear masks, signs that the effect of fear is wearing off.
Will the public support another lockdown?
Unlikely!
Previous Lockdowns went ahead because enough people complied.
Boris wouldn't call another one because it would face more opposition. Remember that Boris is a weather vane.
Even the doom mongering scientists are modifying their message such as Ferguson. The Zeitgeist is turning against them.
I wouldn't invoke Mao in my case for resistance, I would invoke Gandhi. Civil Disobedience.
DeleteAll we need is enough non compliance and this thing falls apart.
Trouble is too many people are still fearful.
Now certain hospitals will deny organ transplants to the unvaccinated.
ReplyDeleteWhy don't you join Qanon? They are resisting Vaccination.
ReplyDelete