So here we are: the
“vaccine passports” the British Government, with characteristic
disingenuousness told us it had “no plans to introduce”(1) will soon be a reality.
This of course should come as no surprise, arriving as it does on the back of a
plethora of demands from politicians and mainstream media for a policy of
coercive “vaccination.” You may remember
Piers Morgan’s infamous tweets: “Love the
idea of covid vaccine passports for everywhere: flights, restaurants, clubs,
football, gyms, shops etc. It’s time covid-denying, anti-vaxxer loonies had
their bullsh*t bluff called & bar themselves from going anywhere that
responsible citizens go.”, (2) and from 2020, “To all the anti-vaxxer Covidiots predictably now screaming that they
won’t have the jab, let me say this: a) If it’s approved then I will have it
done live on TV. b) If you refuse to have it then no more flying for you, and
no using the NHS if you get covid. Deal?”(3) plus Tony Blair’s call in the Mail on February 13th for
Britain to “lead the way” in developing “some sort of Covid passport.” (4) “We should plan for an agreed passport now,”
he insisted. “The arguments against it
really don’t add up.” Somewhat rich, you may feel coming from a man who led
Britain into a probably illegal war in Iraq on questionable evidence. Even the Telegraph shamelessly published an
article calling for changes in law to facilitate a “no jab, no job” policy (5)
for employers.We can now expect, in the not-too-distant future, for the
“vaccine” to be declared mandatory, after the British Government has told us it
has “no plans to make vaccination
compulsory.” (6). In law at present, compulsory vaccination doesn’t exist,
as explained in an article by Louise Hooper of Garden Court Chambers who states, “social media concerns that changes to the law mean that the government
has the power to force vaccines or other medication on you are wrong and
unfounded.”(7) One suspects Ms. Hooper may soon be forced to eat her words.It
is impossible to overstate the enormity of such a monstrous development. We
must be clear on what this implies: removal of the right to make informed
choices about invasions into our living bodies, removal of the right to refuse
to be the subject of medical experimentation. This is what the “vaccine”
amounts to, simply because nothing like it has ever been developed before, as
admitted by Horizon, the EU Research and
Innovation Magazine which stated in April 2020, “If an mRNA vaccine was
approved for coronavirus, it would be the first of its type.” (8) This
seems to be at odds with the claim in The
Conversation made on 18th February
that, “The mRNA technology that
was used in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines has existed for more than
a decade and is not new in the vaccine development field.” (9) One would
have to stretch a point to reconcile these two statements. There can be no doubt that its provenance is
extraordinary given the fact that vaccines normally take more than ten years to
develop and go through several stages of rigorous testing, (10) which in this
case, has not been done. (11) It also functions in a manner never tried before,
gene manipulation (see 8) This alone renders the “vaccine” de facto experimental. There are several incontestable references
to international and historic protocol which make it clear that forced or
coercive medical procedures, especially of an experimental nature, are
unacceptable, for example, the Nuremberg Code, which contains as its first principle “The voluntary consent of the human subject
is absolutely essential” (12), possibly unlawful given Hooper’s advice
above, and in view of Article 7.3.2 of the declaration by the Council of Europe
of which we are still a member, that member states should “ensure
that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to
possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated” (13) unethical,
violating Article 6 of UNESCO’S Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human
Rights, (14) and utterly monstrous. Vaccine passports were previously dismissed
as “conspiracy theory”. They now threaten to become a reality very soon.
The United Kingdom,
has, throughout this “crisis,” been at the “forefront” in showing Europe, if not
the world, how to turn a free democracy into a brutal totalitarian state almost
overnight. The entire Covid-19 narrative has been characterised by
fearmongering and censorship, unprecedented cancellation of our everyday
liberties, a visual stigma (forced face-mask wearing) and enforced detention,
such as the “quarantine” measures put in place for UK arrivals. It has also encompassed a campaign of
demonisation aimed at lockdown opponents and Covid-sceptics as “deniers,”
“conspiracy theorists” and “anti-vaxxers”, all meaningless, etymologically
unsound epithets intended to render anyone questioning what’s going on as
subhuman in the public’s eyes, in preparation for the next phase.
Forced or coercive
vaccination has a horrible feeling about it of being the beginning of the Final
Solution, and its implementation is now imminent. Those going online
celebrating having been “vaccinated”, would quite possibly, in 1942, have walked into the gas chamber telling
themselves it was a shower.
You don’t have to be
opposed to vaccines as such to see that this is profoundly wicked, profoundly
wrong. You don’t even have to be opposed to this particular vaccine. But you
should, and indeed, it is your duty as a free citizen and a defender of
democracy, to oppose forced or coercive vaccination. If you are tempted to
respond by saying, “Why should you have the same privileges as me, such as
flying, going to the theatre etc when you haven’t had the vaccine?” may I
remind you that these are not “privileges” at all but our fundamental rights in
a free democracy. They are non-negotiable. They are not codicils dependent on
invasive medical procedures that may be unsafe. Furthermore, if we allow this,
inevitably, our freedoms will further become circumvented by technocratic
doctrines like “carbon footprints.” You may in time, be asked to submit to some
other procedure that worries you, for example
in the case of yourself or a loved one contracting a debilitating and
incurable illness, to a presumption of
consent to euthanasia. Granted, I have no real evidence for such a statement
and offer it as an illustration of the basic precept which underpins forced
vaccines. But then again, only a year ago, forced quarantines, endless
lockdowns, forced face-masks, hate campaigns against sceptics and vaccination
passports did not exist.
The game is up. We can
no longer focus on the question of whether current policies are appropriate or
proportionate, whether lockdowns work, how deadly SARS-COV-2 is or which
“science” to believe in. We, the people, whatever our views on all of the
above, now have a duty to stop forced and coercive vaccination because it’s
coming, and it’s coming soon. It isn’t enough for the government to say it has
no plans to make “vaccination” compulsory. It also needs to take positive steps
to make sure that it does not become either coercive or forced. If you accept
that, what is coming next?
If you are ready for this battle, here’s how you
can help. Sign the open letter by Save our Rights calling for a Health Freedom
Bill. (15) Write to your MP with this as a template. Sign a petition that calls
for a Freedom Bill. If you can’t find one, start one. Tell your friends and ask
some questions: a good starting point is OffGuardian’sFive Questions to ask your Friends who plan to get the Covid Vaccine,(16)
if only to encourage them to make
informed choices. I’d be the last to try and stop them after all. But most of
all, ask yourself and your family and friends Should medical experimentation be conducted only with your express
consent? If the answer to that is “yes,” the case for coercive vaccination
instantly vanishes. Demonstrate if you have to. The hangman is now at the gate.
Don’t listen to the democracy and freedom-deniers in the MSM, the baiters like
Morgan, or the vaccine press-gangs.
Time is running out.
Coercive “vaccination” is already here, the logical
outcome of this project is mandatory
vaccination. Stop it. Before it’s too late. We cannot afford to lose this
battle.
(1) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/covid-vaccine-passport-nadhim-zahawi-b1798785.html
(2) https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1360933501739159552
(3)https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1326182423588196353?lang=en
(5) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/01/28/no-jab-no-job-policy-should-law/
(6) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/13155808/vaccine-matt-hancock-not-compulsary/
(8) https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/five-things-you-need-know-about-mrna-vaccines.html
(9) https://theconversation.com/6-important-truths-about-covid-19-vaccines-154341
(10) https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/vaccine-development-barriers-coronavirus/
(11) https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/03/what-vaccine-trials/
(12) -1 https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1448.1
(13) https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29004/html
14)http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
I notice this blog was written nearly 6 months ago. At present we have no forced vaccination plan, however, we do have a carrot and stick approach.
ReplyDeleteSo far, it appears that travel is the main area of coercion. If you wish to travel to certain countries, you are required to provide proof of vaccination, failing to do so can result in having to endure a quarantine. This in itself is not forced vaccination.
The most explicit policy on this so far is the issue of proof of vaccination required to enter nightclubs.
One could argue that this in itself makes sense. They are enclosed environments, apt breeding ground for the virus, so proof of vaccination is not an unreasonable request.
You raise some interesting points, though I do not directly see evidence of forced vaccination.
Hi. I wrote this when "vaccine passports" were mooted in the UK following prior statements that there were "no plans" to do so. Also, the point of the piece, which you seem to have missed, is that unless we are vigilant, forced vaccination will soon become a reality. Further, since that time, care workers are now being forced to choose between "vaccination" and their jobs. Lastly, the idea that anyone should have to provide "evidence of vaccination" to travel anywhere is profoundly illiberal. Though I've had inoculations for travel before, they certainly weren't compulsory. You appear to support this policy. Events always overtake speculation.
DeleteI don't support the policy of Forced Vaccination, however, there are certain carrot and stick approaches which we cannot avoid. It all depends on the extent to which you are willing to forego certain pleasures in order to avoid Vaccination. At present that is limited to Nightclubbing, but inevitably it will be more.
DeleteMaybe I am illiberal? Is that a bad thing? Viktor Orban wears the badge illiberal with pride.
In the days of the USSR people would use the label anti Socialist as a smear.
I don't know if the term illiberal is a smear or not.
Forced Vaccination I object to on principle.
DeleteHowever, at present there is incentivized vaccination rather than forced Vaccination. So far in UK this applies only to Nightclubs, though it ought to have applied to Festivals also.
Whether we like it or not, certain professions require certain medical precautions. Truck drivers, a current ongoing issue, require up to date general medical checks.
The issue with the Pandemic is that it is a public health matter. It is about mitigating the spread of the virus, or at least that is what sensible countries are aiming for, as opposed to the outdated and impossible Zero Covid Policy pursued by Australia, New Zealand, China and other East Asian countries.
Vaccination helps with mitigating the virus and helping us achieve what is realistic, to simply live with the virus.
However, having researched the vaccine I see no reasonable argument against it, or at least not Pfizer or Moderna. Astra Zeneca is more questionable.
So far I have seen no clear case against the vaccine as a whole, though I am open to reasonable arguments.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr-consent/?next_url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.washingtonpost.com%2fhealth%2f2021%2f10%2f05%2fuchealth-transplant-unvaccinated%2f
ReplyDeleteAbove is the Washington Post article concerning policies that require one to be vaccinated to be eligible for Organ Transplants. It is in America, but I could just as easily see it happening in UK.
ReplyDeleteShould not certain professions require vaccination, such as healthcare?
DeleteThis makes sense both in principle and from a practical point of view.